How To See The Truth

The Cartesian method doesn’t work if you just eliminate everything except self-evident axioms. Fortunately, we have access to more than just self-evident axioms. Consider the following short exchange, between two people. It touches on the race/intelligence issue, but it works for many other issues. This is just an instance of a wider phenomenon. You go in with the following assumptions, which provide the important subtext for the discussion:

  1. Person A believes that there are differences in intelligence between races, while Person B does not.
  2. Person A and Person B both believe that intelligence is largely genetic.
  3. Both people each think the other one believes that intelligence is not genetic, and pretend to believe that it is not genetic in public.
  4. Both people know that there are serious social consequences for the view that intelligence is genetic and for the view that there are racial differences in intelligence.

A: “Intelligence is largely genetic.”
B: “But if that’s true, then different races have different levels of intelligence. Are you racist?”
A: “I don’t believe that there are racial differences in intelligence!”
B: “Then you can’t believe that intelligence is largely genetic.”

Notice that Person B has a choice here. He can either decide that intelligence is not largely genetic and slip further into delusion, or he can decide that there are racial differences in intelligence and pretend to believe something that he doesn’t actually believe, as person A does. Guess which one happens more often? That’s right: the former. We more often slip into delusion because we live in a delusional society. What’s the way out?

The way out is to take the things you know are true, and eliminate those things that contradict them, ruthlessly. Don’t take only one issue, or you turn into, for example, a stupid White Nationalist who only cares about race. The answer is to subtract all value added to judgements based on social cache. That will free you.

Is Trump afraid of the affirmative action police?

No, of course he’s not. But getting Trump to repeal affirmative action and disparate impact laws is a priority right now, and we can’t get him to do it by begging. But what if we spread the meme that he’s afraid to do it? Right now, such a meme would not take off. However, if he drags his feet on the issue, we can make a case that he is afraid to touch affirmative action laws. How would Trump, a person who pays attention to social media, react, if he saw that people thought he was afraid to attack affirmative action policies? He’d prove us all “wrong.” He’s a man who responds to challenges.

Remember this one. It’s important.

Imminence and Transcendence

The tension between imminence and transcendence is the irritating grain-of-sand-in-the-oyster-that-makes-the-pearl (hyphens!) that has plagued philosophers from Heraclitus straight up through to the present day. Heraclitus had some mystical stuff about flux being organized by an eternal logos and Parmenides gave the imminent world a giant middle finger and rode off into the unchanging sunset with his arm around transcendence. I would like to go with him.

Fast-forward to the present day, and we have a conundrum. We see that a total focus on imminence tends to send everything down the shitter, while a total focus on transcendence leaves you helpless. It would be great if we could reconcile them, but we can’t, because that’s impossible.

Brett Stevens over at Amerika is a Heraclitus if there ever was one. His nihilism basically takes the bare intuitive notion of “reality” and chucks everything else out the window. This leads to a transcendent pragmatism, if you can imagine such a thing, that might just break through into the next age. But I can see the seed of trouble in it. His notion of transcendence is too small. Don’t get me wrong. Like I said, a true reconciliation between the immanence and transcendence is impossible. Stevens takes the bare notion of reality (which is where he gets his transcendence) and uses “pattern-order” or the ongoing process of nature, as the means by which that bare notion of reality leaks into the phenomenal world.

The trouble is that brilliant little Konigsbergian bastard, Kant. Stevens, I deduce, imbibed a shit-ton of Nietzsche (the most potent psychoactive he tried, no doubt), who brings with him Kant’s dark agnosticism about the noumenal realm. The danger is that the bare notion of reality will drop out of the picture when some one-sigma-above-average smartass decides to bracket it away as a useful heuristic or something. Then the transcendence winks out and we’re left with the same old dialectical materialist me-me-me egocentric circle-jerk that has defined the past few centuries of our decline.

What I see here, and what I suspect Stevens also sees, is that we need a real spirituality. We need an authentic, real, honest-to-God (words not chosen lightly) sense of transcendence apprehended in living experience. More importantly, we need a life path for this. The problem is that you can’t put this stuff together with an abstract rule system (a favorite whipping-boy over at Amerika for the past year or so), but in order for large numbers of people to seek such transcendence, you need a culture in place.

This is the key. The next culture that comes up, the heir to the legacy of the West, will be born at the same time as, intertwined with, and reciprocally defined by, the spirituality discovered by despairing modern man. It starts with us.

Not sure how to close this essay, except to let you all know to buy a nice extensive library of a particular kind of book (Evola, Tao Te Ching, Eckhardt, etc.), read the fuck out of it, and engage in some spiritual practice or the other. Doesn’t matter what kind – sit on a cushion and stare at your nose, pray to rocks and trees, whatever. Just get moving.

The Future

The biggest obstacle for the visionaries of the Right is the difficulty of imagining a radically different future. I like the “four pillars” of reactionary thought currently circulating through the alt-right sphere:

  1. Culture
    We have an identity and a continuity with the past, which acts as a compass.
  2. Discipline
    The human ego, with its weakness and pettiness, is the root of most of the evil in the world. We defeat the dysfunction and entropy in society by defeating it in ourselves.
  3. Aristocracy
    Hierarchy in society, put the best in charge. We don’t do this through a system of rules. We do it as individuals by finding the best people around us and pushing them to take charge.
  4. Transcendence
    There exists a reality outside of us that is inaccessible to the analytical intellect and phenomenal consciousness. Our reverence to the ineffable, and its primary emanations (i.e. the pattern-order of the universe and the laws of nature) is what guides us in the right direction and provides us with a goal.

By themselves, though, these aren’t enough. We need a more concrete vision, guided and defined by the four pillars. Here are some thoughts:

  1. Culture, the first pillar, is to be realized through two prongs. First, reject the trash that modern society has produced, not by censoring or destroying it, but by ignoring it and refusing to engage in it. Amidst all the trash, some isolated men in modern society have created worthwhile art and philosophy. Take what is good and reject everything else. Art is a product of the struggle for self-definition and accomplishment of a civilization. That’s the direction toward which our art tends.
  2. Discipline, the second pillar, means striving for excellence in your individual life. The quality of individuals is what gives rise to the quality of civilizations. Physical and mental strength and health is what we need as individuals, and until we have it, we don’t have a chance.
  3. Aristocracy, the third pillar, cannot be realized by a system of rules. If you know someone who is a natural leader, push them to take charge. If you know someone who is a natural thinker, push them to create. This can’t be accomplished by us all following a checklist; it has to be a case of each of us using their best judgment.
  4. Transcendence, the fourth pillar, is the most difficult, and the culmination of the first three. When the first three are in place, the fourth will arrive on its own, and it becomes evident at that point that the striving for transcendence was at the root of the impulse to put the first three pillars in place.


Bait and Switch

Any word that is overused loses its meaning, and this goes double for words with vague meanings. “Alt-right” is such a word. We have an opportunity here.

  1. Allow “alt-right” to be used as a witch-hunting term, which will happen more and more often as “racist” and “Nazi” and other such words lose their meanings due to abuse. We will work to undermine the Nazi meme, both through argument and through provocation:

    This is what Richard Spencer and the Alt Right are going on about when they throw Roman salutes with Tila Tequila, or whatever happened. The Alt Right is pure provocation. Its goal is to legitimize all of the things that are made taboo by egalitarianism,

  2. One “alt-right” has become a term to designate anyone the Left doesn’t like, and once this behavior is sufficiently widely spread to be recognizable by anyone, we reclaim the term and normalize it as well. This will be possible after we are finished undermining the Nazi meme.
  3. Once we reclaim the term, we do two things in tandem. First, convince everyone on the right, or almost everyone, to identify as “alt-right” in response to its use as a slur. Then, use that as a means of legitimizing the alt-right subculture.

If that last step is confusing, consider the use of the term, “feminist.” The feminists insist on a definition of feminism that equates it with gender equality, and then, when people assent to the definition, subsume them into the feminist subculture by means of identity politics. We’re pulling a parallel move here.

Our Own Worst Enemy

The basic proposition beneath this entry is that the rise of the Right in Western countries is inevitable, unless we fuck it up. So, how could that happen? How could we fuck it up?

  1. Single-Issue-ism. This is the most dangerous one, in that it could screw us even if the Right succeeds. Our societies have gotten to this point because civilizations decay over time and we allowed ours to go down the tubes. No excuses. Blaming THE JEWS™, the Left, or even abstract ideas like egalitarianism is a mistake because it obscures the real cause of our decline, which is the human ego running rampant. Incidentally, this is the same thing that has killed many other societies. Go ahead and fix the rot where you see it, but keep in mind that these are all symptoms, not causes.
  2. Dilution/subversion. This is the second most dangerous one. Basically, we fail if we allow ourselves to be co-opted. This is the most visible issue to most alt-righters. The basic problem is that we cannot allow ourselves to become another institutionally-approved political movement, but we also can’t shut ourselves off in the margins of society.

    The key to avoiding subversion and co-opting is to ensure that the alt-right changes society, and not the other way around. Every time we advance, we have to force a concession from society that changes the context of the debate. The key here is a preservation of right-ward momentum, which is to say that we refuse to compromise the core of our movement while allowing “alt-light” movements to exist as a vanguard.

  3. Laziness. This one is a distant third, because the alt-right is driven by the kind of rage that does not die easily. However, it is possible, albeit unlikely, that big successes may make us complacent, and we won’t push as hard. A close examination shows this to be the same danger as point 2.


Siehst Vater du, den Erlkönig nicht?
Den Erlenkönig, mit Kruhn und Schweif.”
“Mein Sohn, es ist ein Nebelstreif.”

Goethe’s Erlkönig is a poem about a supernatural being that (it is implied) steals the soul of a young boy as his father carries him home. The boy repeatedly tells the father about the Erlkönig. The father replies each time by explaining it away naturalistically, as errors in the boy’s perception of reality. Eventually, the fault in the father’s explanation is made clear, and the Erlkönig kills the boy. The poem ends with the death of the boy, and makes no mention of the aftermath. We all see the death coming, but its aftermath is something we don’t give much thought to.

The Left has continuously cast about for an explanation of the current rightward shift that works within their own paradigm. Of course, no such explanation exists. You can persist with a faulty paradigm for a while, but reality catches up sooner or later. Working with a bad outlook on reality is like doing algebra beginning with a faulty equation. The more complex your calculations get, the more the original error propagates, until the whole thing dissolves into utter nonsense and you conclude that 1 = 0. The consequences of delusion may be slow in coming, but they are ineluctable.

As darkness closes in on the northern hemisphere, just remember that there is no way to counterattack against an enemy advancing from a direction in which you refuse to look. They will not, cannot see us coming, because they have staked their claim on an illusion that we reject. When I insist that Leftism is self-undermining, people have always replied that this can’t be true, because they would have lost long ago. What such people failed to see was that, just because Leftism has escaped the consequences of its own iniquity so far, doesn’t mean that it always will. Our day will come, and then the question arises of what to do next.

Take heart, friends. Do something special for the Solstice, or Christmas, or whatever you prefer to call it. If you are of European descent, your ancestors have been doing it for thousands of years. As you do so, don’t reflect on the current state of the world. Reflect on the future, on what you would like to see. It can be hard to imagine anything outside of our current sick society, but it will not be this way forever. Look to the old stories and myths and philosophers for guidance, or even the writings of those who refused to imbibe modernity despite being born into its clutches. What comes next?

Erreicht den Hof mit Müh’ und Not;
In seinen Armen das Kind war tot.